V.17:6 (257-259): Buy-And-Hold Comparisons To Evaluate Stock Trading by Jack Schwager
Product Description
Buy-And-Hold Comparisons
To Evaluate Stock Trading by Jack Schwager
Benchmark comparisons are a standard technique for the performance of a trading system. One particular benchmark is the buy-and-hold approach. This noted market analyst looks at the steps to using it.
Just because a trading system makes money in the stock market doesn’t mean it’s a good system. After all, it is possible for a system to do well but still fall short of the results that could have been realized by a simple buy-and-hold approach. The key question in testing a stock market system is: How does the system compare with the buy-and-hold approach?
THE PROBLEM Answering this question is not as simple as it might appear. In my previous article, we showed why a constant share size trade assumption led to severe distortions in testing trading systems and why a constant dollar trade size assumption was far preferable. The problem, however, is that system results based on a constant dollar trade size — for example, $1,000 — cannot be directly compared with buy-and-hold results for the same number of shares as the first trade.
To understand why, assume a stock is trading at $5 at the start of the test period before it then advances to $50 by the end of the survey period. In this case, 200 shares, which equal $1,000 at the start, would equal $10,000 at the end. In contrast, the constant dollar trade size system results would continue to assume a $1,000 trade size on each signal.
As a result, the buy-and-hold case would assume a much larger average position size as time elapsed. Consequently, a comparison between the system results and buy-and-hold results would be that of the proverbial apples and oranges.
Benchmark comparisons are a standard technique for the performance of a trading system. One particular benchmark is the buy-and-hold approach. This noted market analyst looks at the steps to using it.
Just because a trading system makes money in the stock market doesn’t mean it’s a good system. After all, it is possible for a system to do well but still fall short of the results that could have been realized by a simple buy-and-hold approach. The key question in testing a stock market system is: How does the system compare with the buy-and-hold approach?
THE PROBLEM Answering this question is not as simple as it might appear. In my previous article, we showed why a constant share size trade assumption led to severe distortions in testing trading systems and why a constant dollar trade size assumption was far preferable. The problem, however, is that system results based on a constant dollar trade size — for example, $1,000 — cannot be directly compared with buy-and-hold results for the same number of shares as the first trade.
To understand why, assume a stock is trading at $5 at the start of the test period before it then advances to $50 by the end of the survey period. In this case, 200 shares, which equal $1,000 at the start, would equal $10,000 at the end. In contrast, the constant dollar trade size system results would continue to assume a $1,000 trade size on each signal.
As a result, the buy-and-hold case would assume a much larger average position size as time elapsed. Consequently, a comparison between the system results and buy-and-hold results would be that of the proverbial apples and oranges.
FOR THOSE ORDERING ARTICLES SEPARATELY:
*Note: $2.95-$5.95 Articles are in PDF format only. No hard copy of the article(s) will be delivered. During checkout, click the "Download Now" button to immediately receive your article(s) purchase. STOCKS & COMMODITIES magazine is delivered via mail. After paying for your subscription at store.traders.com users can view the S&C Digital Edition in the subscriber's section on Traders.com.
| Take Control of Your Trading. |
| Professional Traders' Starter Kit |
| All these items shown below only $299.99! |
| Click Here to Order |